Woman History Class Chapter Outlines Example

Woman History Class Chapter Outlines Example Woman History Class: Chapter Outlines â€" Essay Example > Chapter Outline of Nancy F. Cott’s, “Equal Rights and Economic Roles” Keber and DeHart, 379-89The author’s main argument was that, it was better for women to break free from the concessions accorded by the laws of sex-based protectionism, thereby ensuring themselves the widest choice of opportunities on the labor market. However, this vision in the 1920s did not come without a conflict of ideas, as it required redefining the very basic meaning of feminism â€" whether is meant a unique position for themselves as different from men, or it meant removal of subjugation of all sorts, and claiming equal rights in all aspects and reorient their thinking focusing on women’s definition of rights rather than male definition of rights. The author has supported the concept of removing all forms of discrimination, which will enable women to claim equal rights as men in all walks of life. The supporters of sex-based protective legislation failed to see the need to challenge the divisi on of labor on gendered grounds, which was the root cause of discrimination. The protective laws also seemed to discourage women from taking up employment, and therefore nourished apprehensions against employing them. The author has quoted very little statistical evidence to validate the claims of either side. A few more statistical figures for both sides would have helped the readers arrive at their own decisions, as to which side had been preferred by the women of the period. The Key Terms are: 1) ERA or Equal Rights Amendment proposal by NWP 2) National Women’s Party and 3) LWA or the League of Women Voters. Equal Rights Amendment was first proposed by the National Women’s Party, headed by Alice Paul. Shortly after the 19th Amendment in 1920, the NWP started rethinking their stand on the issue of the sex-based state regulation. Though they had avidly fought for it earlier, some factions within the NWP felt that it was hampering women workers opportunities in the labor marke t. Other women leaders led by the League of Women’s Voters which was actually a daughter movement of the National American Woman Suffrage Association were calling for an elimination of the sex-discrimination in the law. However, the tables turned and under the guidance of Gail Laughlin it no longer supported sex-based legislation. With the Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments in 1923, the NWP advocated “equal rights” that did away with any discrimination between male and females so as to ensure a wider scope of job opportunities for women. However, it met with bitter opposition from various sections of women trade unionists like Pauline Newman and Dr. Alice Hamilton, and a former factory worker Mary Anderson. Critical Thinking QuestionsWhat were the principle points on which the ERA of NWP was opposed by sex-based legislation supporters? What gave credence to their arguments? How did the perception of the view that NWP’s views reflected only those of the privileged women of the dominant community contribute to the defeat of the equal rights proposal? Chapter Outline of Valerie Matsumoto’s, “Japanese American Women during World War II” Keber and DeHart, 459-65